Start with a free snapshot. Upgrade when a headline, article, paper or product claim is worth checking properly.
The free check gives a useful first pass. The full report is for claims you want to understand properly, save, print or send to someone you choose.
For quick curiosity checks when you want a fast read on whether a claim looks overhyped.
Limited free checks. Duplicate URLs may reuse previous analysis.
Start free checkFor claims that may affect what you buy, share, believe, recommend or discuss.
Beta price. Planned standard price: £9.99.
Check the article, then unlock full reportThe upgrade should feel like a deeper audit, not a paywall on basic understanding.
| Feature | Free Snapshot | Full Report |
|---|---|---|
| Preliminary grade | Yes | Yes |
| Source-chain tracing | Limited | Full |
| Study design explanation | Short | Detailed |
| Claim audit | Short | Detailed |
| Caveats and safer interpretation | Basic | Full |
| Private report link to save, print or send | No | Yes |
| Depth of evidence context | Basic | Detailed |
A full report does not just summarise an article. It checks the claim against the underlying evidence, traces the source chain where possible, explains what the study actually showed, and separates strong evidence from speculation, extrapolation or hype.
What the article, headline or product page appears to suggest.
Media article → press release → study or source evidence.
Study type, limitations, exaggeration and safer interpretation.
Some headlines are just interesting. Others may influence behaviour, purchasing, sharing, clinical conversations or investment thinking.
Diet, cancer, supplements, dementia, longevity and prevention claims deserve more than a quick summary.
Check whether a viral science claim is supported before amplifying it to colleagues, readers or family.
Useful for journalists, clinicians, researchers and analysts who need a structured evidence trail — not patient-specific advice.
Short answers to reduce purchase anxiety and avoid overclaiming what a report can do.
No. deHype reports are evidence-chain analyses for general information. They do not replace personalised clinical advice.
The report will say so. A useful result may be that the claim is not well supported, or that the available evidence is indirect.
Paid reports are private by default. deHype will not list a paid report publicly unless you explicitly request that later.
The report can only assess accessible information and should clearly flag source-access limitations.
During beta, automated paid report generation is designed to start shortly after payment. Complex or poorly sourced claims may need clearer caveats, and the private access page will show the current report status.
Use support@dehype.io for payment or access problems.
Paste a public article, DOI, paper or claim. Use the free snapshot first, then upgrade only if the claim deserves a full audit.
Tell us what felt unclear, unsupported or hard to use so the evidence checks can improve.